RSS
 

Posts Tagged ‘hood’

Något stinker i USA

07 Nov

Kropparna är inte ens kalla än och ändå har folk börjat skapa sig en viss bild av händelserna i USA. Här kommer en lite annorlunda version, en version som belyser det motsägelsefulla i vad som hände och hänt i USA.

Fort Hood Shooter Information Not Adding Up

Corruption American Style

November 6, 2009

What happened Thursday November 5, 2009 was a tragedy.  Gunman Major Nidal Malik Hasan allegedly snapped and went on a shooting rampage at Fort Hood in Texas, killing at least 12 and injuring 31 others. The information coming in has been conflicting and at times wildly contradictory. Some of this is the result of the newness of the tragedy. But through nonstop coverege the media has begun to flesh out a good deal of the story, and yet a careful examination of just some of the more widely stated information shows there are troubling and conflicting problems with the MSM and government’s version of what happened.

This is starting to have the earmarks and anatomy of a disinformation psy ops story.

For instance, the media reported that Hasan was promoted to Major in May of this year. And yet, stories coming from what is passing as his family, the FBI and co-workers state that Hasan had wanted out of the military given the government’s stand on Afghanistan and Muslims. Indeed, his Aunt “Noel Hasan” (who is interestingly enough identified herself as a Bank President) and his cousin both gave statements to the media which provided that Hasan wanted out of the military and had been harassed since 9-11 about his Muslim faith. Co-workers and the authorities have also stated that Hasan had an Internet presence and a Facebook account, and the FBI has him under survailance for the past 6 months for radical anti-American and pro-Muslim writings on his online accounts.

Now, why on earth would the military promote a man who was unhappy, had objected to being in the military, had not wanted to deploy to anywhere outside of the U.S., and who had allegedly made himself a security threat with online radical comments? The answer is they would never promote such an individual, and someone who badly wants out of the military (to the point of offering to pay back medical school costs to the U.S. military, according to Hasan’s Banker aunt). Not only that, if Hasan was truly radical and wanted out he would have never put in for a promotion to Major. But the fact remains he was promoted to Major this year. Try to reconcile those conflicting testimonies and facts.

The media had originally reported that witnesses had seen between 3 and 5 gunmen. Then that number went to 3, with Hasan being wounded and taken in to custody, and two other suspects allegedly being taken into custody and later released after being “cleared” and jumping into a Crown Victoria with US Government license plates on it (and men in suits inside). Now we are even being told that Hasan was yelling “Allahu Akbar” or (Allah is good) while he was gunning down victims. Hours ago witnesses remarked how methodical and stoic the  accused gunman was.

On top of this, several outlets were reporting that Hasan was an expert or marksman shooter with a pistol in the army, and had spent numerous hours honing his shooting skills.  Then, that rumor was undercut by the following statement to Fox News:

”The shooter’s cousin, Nader Hasan, told Fox News that their family is in shock.

“We are trying to make sense of all this,” Nader Hasan said. “He wasn’t even someone who enjoyed       going to the firing range.”

They cannot even decide if the man if 40 or 39.  And on top of that, he graduated from Virginia Tech for his undergraduate work, and others “close” to Hasan said he was gentle and quiet and wanted to make a career out of his Psychiatry degree in the military. Hasan was not married, but very religious who prayed daily. One source stated he was not looking for a wife, another source (in the same article) says he was.

Confused yet? It is only going to get worse. And one thing is for sure, Hasan will be the lone gunman, the other’s idenitified by eyewitnesses as shooters as well will be ignored and forgotten by the military and the media.  And Hasan will be portrayed as a radical unstable Muslim idealist who somehow passed screening into the Army, into Army medical school and psychiatry residency, and the lone gunman here.

And since Hasan has no immediate family and is single, with two so-called family members who appear to have all the media savvy of a PR man from the Rendon Group, he is the perfect patsy.

I hate to say it, but this tragedy stinks to high heavens and reaks of clandestine intelligence operations.
Only time will tell, but the government media complex will continue to lie about this for as long as they can get away with it. And against this backdrop, the website Chicago.com is blasting President Obama for his Frightening Insinsesativity following the shootings.

We are truly living in a bizarre and corrupt time.

DN.se

DN.se 2


Liknande inlägg:

 
1 Comment

Posted in Islamofobi

 

En massaker kontra en massaker

07 Nov

Idag rapporterade DN.se om en massaker på en militärbas i USA. Kommentarerna och bloggarna som diskuterar mördaren och morden, är överlag negativa mot islam och muslimer.  Vissa hävdar att vi har en grupp ibland oss som är en fara för oss i väst. En annan (en av förgrundsgestalterna för SD) försöker även den frossa i att en person, som dricker alkohol, som blivit mobbad och förnedrad av sina kollegor i armén, valde att angripa soldaterna som just skulle iväg för att mörda barn och kvinnor i länder som Afghanistan och Irak.

Bloggarna bryr sig mycket om denna persons härkomst, han är född i USA men det spelar ingen roll, utan hans religion spelar roll, hans föräldrars härkomst spelar roll. Vi har alltså återgått till medeltiden, då man straffades för att ens föräldrar var brottslingar. Nu straffas man för att ens föräldrar var muslimer/araber. En av islamofoberna kallar skytten för ”jihadist”. Jihadist betyder en person som kämpar jihad för islam. Frågan är ju varför han inte sköt någon tidigare? Han har ju varit på förläggningen en längre tid och jobbat för den amerikanska armén i över fem år.

Samtidigt rapporteras det om en ensam mördare i Florida, som gick till sin gamle arbetsplats och där sköt ihjäl en person och sårade fem andra. Denna man begick också en ”massaker”, men enbart en enda bloggar om honom, ingen kommenterar ifall han är vit eller röd, ingen bryr sig ifall han är muslim eller kristen.

Vad är skillnaden mellan en massaker och en annan? Är det religionen? Ligger skillnaden i en persons härkomst, eller hans föräldrars härkomst? Varför skriver så många om en mördares religion men skiter fullständigt i den andres religion och härkomst?

Frågor som jag enkelt kan besvara med, rasism och islamofobi. Förr i tiden så tyckte folk att judar hade en genetisk defekt som gjorde dem till tjuvar och girigbukar, idag har vi en gen som gör  muslimer (konvertiter eller ej) till mördare och brottslingar.

En märklig sak med bloggarna och de som kommenterar fallet, är att de inte brukar bry sig om när USA mördar oskyldiga, de bryr sig inte om när USA skjuter ihjäl barn och kvinnor i Afghanistan och Irak. Det verkar som om amerikanska soldaters liv är mera värda än muslimska barn och kvinnor, eller är min analys felaktig? Finns det ingen rasism i bloggare som talar om jihad och om muslimsk fanatism?

Liknande inlägg: